Volume 15, Number 2
2005
PDF files of all articles are available from IOS
Press.
Return to Issue Contents
Return to Issues
|
 |
The balance control of bilateral peripheral vestibular loss subjects and its improvement
with auditory prosthetic feedback
pp. 109 - 117
J. Hegeman, F. Honegger, M. Kupper, J.H.J. Allum
Objectives: We investigated whether long-term bilateral
vestibular loss subjects could combine auditory biofeedback of
trunk sway with their remaining natural sensory inputs on
balance to provide an improved control of trunk sway. A
successful integration of natural and artificial signals would
provide a basis for a balance prosthesis.
Methods: Trunk sway of 6 bilateral peripheral vestibular loss
subjects (BVL) was recorded using either angular position- or
velocity-based auditory feedback or no feedback during stance
and gait tasks. Roll and pitch trunk movements were recorded
with angular velocity transducers mounted just above the waist
and feedback without a delay to 4 loudspeakers placed at the
left, right, front and rear borders of the 5 m long by 4 m wide
test environment. The two types of auditory feedback or no
feedback were provided to the subjects in random order. In the
feedback modes, sway greater than a preset angle (ca. 0.5 deg)
or velocity (ca. 3 deg/s) thresholds caused a tone to be emitted
from the speaker towards which the subject moved. The tone
volume increased with increasing angle or angular velocity
amplitude.
Results: For all stance tasks BVL subjects without auditory
feedback had a significantly different balance control with
respect to that of normal controls. BVL way values eyes open on
a normal surface were reduced with auditory feedback with the
greatest reductions in the roll plane. Specifically for the task
of standing on 1 leg eyes open with position-auditory- feedback,
amplitudes of pitch and roll angles and angular velocities were
indistinguishable from those of normal controls. Sway during
stance tasks on foam with eyes closed showed no improvement with
feedback, remaining greater than normal. For some gait tasks
there was a decrease in trunk sway with velocity
feedback.
Conclusion: These initial results indicate that subjects with
vestibular loss could incorporate the auditory prosthetic
sensory information into their balance commands, particularly in
the roll plane if the balance task is performed with eyes open.
Position information appears more useful than velocity
information in reducing trunk sway during stance tasks. Future
work will need to determine the effect of a training time on the
improvement in balance control using such a prosthetic device
and the ideal position and velocity auditory feedback
combination.
 |